In the Journal

on June 27, 2010 at 11:46 am

Law and Policy of Targeted Killing

Imagine that the U.S. intelligence services obtain reliable information that a known individual is plotting a terrorist attack against the United States. The individual is outside the United States, in a country where law and order are weak and unreliable.

Read more ›
on May 30, 2010 at 12:11 pm

FISA’s Significant Purpose Requirement and the Government’s Ability to Protect National Security

By Scott J. Glick* – Click here for the published PDF version In 2006, Congress enacted two potentially significant restrictions on the government’s ability to collect foreign intelligence information pursuant to FISA.  Against the backdrop of a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (Court of Review) decision that arguably reached an erroneous conclusion about the meaning and scope of FISA’s […]

Read more ›
on May 5, 2010 at 8:57 pm

The Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities: A Critical Analysis

By Michael Schmitt – Click here to download the published PDF version I.  Introduction In 2003, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), in cooperation with the T.M.C. Asser Institute, launched a major research effort to explore the concept of “direct participation by civilians in hostilities” (DPH Project).[1] The goal was to provide greater clarity regarding the international humanitarian […]

Read more ›
on January 11, 2010 at 12:17 pm

Dialogue, Discourse, and Debate: Introducing the Harvard National Security Journal

September 11, 2001, stands as a critical pivot point in our nation’s history, one that put the threat of terrorism in the national spotlight and demanded immediate expertise in national security.

Read more ›
on January 9, 2010 at 7:09 pm

Volume 1 Editors’ Preface

Robert Williams and Anne Siders Click here to read the full Editors’ Preface “National security” has become a powerful watchword for politicians, lawyers, policy makers, and academics alike.  Invocation of the “national security” label typically aims to signal that the issue under discussion is of the highest priority for public policy.  And yet, when we, as students of national security […]

Read more ›